Archive for the ‘Book review’ Category

The Giving Tree

July 31st, 2009

My husband and I both have very fond memories of reading the book The Giving Tree as children. I always thought it was a wonderful book and it was one of the first children’s books that we put on our wish list. We were very excited to receive a beautiful hard cover copy of it as a gift for our baby. So, a few nights ago I decided to open it up and read it aloud to my stomach. Ever since then I have sort of been thinking about it off and on. Something about it really bothered me when I read it the other night and it continued to bother me throughout the last few days. Today thoughts started to form around this vague bothered feeling and I want to share them here.

I’m guessing that many of you have read this book as it is a very popular children’s story, but if you haven’t here is a short recap of the story from Amazon:

“In Shel Silverstein’s popular tale of few words and simple line drawings, a tree starts out as a leafy playground, shade provider, and apple bearer for a rambunctious little boy. Making the boy happy makes the tree happy, but with time it becomes more challenging for the generous tree to meet his needs. When he asks for money, she suggests that he sell her apples. When he asks for a house, she offers her branches for lumber. When the boy is old, too old and sad to play in the tree, he asks the tree for a boat. She suggests that he cut her down to a stump so he can craft a boat out of her trunk. He unthinkingly does it. At this point in the story, the double-page spread shows a pathetic solitary stump, poignantly cut down to the heart the boy once carved into the tree as a child that said “M.E. + T.” “And then the tree was happy… but not really.” When there’s nothing left of her, the boy returns again as an old man, needing a quiet place to sit and rest. The stump offers up her services, and he sits on it. “And the tree was happy.”

Ok, so I have always thought that this story was a great example of selflessness and generous giving, but as I read it again as an adult I found a whole different story within it and it was honestly unsettling.

Let’s talk about the boy first. The little boy, who grows into an old man through the course of the story, is definitely not someone I want my son to be like. He’s selfish and an incessant consumer. He takes, and takes and takes. He knows the tree loves him and he uses that love to his own advantage to get what he wants. He has no thought for the destructive force of his actions. I do not want my son to manipulate others love for him in the way this boy did. I don’t want him to selfishly walk all over people the way this little boy did. I don’t want him to endlessly consume from others and from the natural resources around him the way this little boy did with no thought of consequences. The boy is not a character I want my son to emulate.

So, how about the tree? When I was younger I felt that the tree was the real hero in the story, the character that should be emulated. I thought the tree’s selfless giving was beautiful and fulfilling, but now I see a different story and a different side of things. It’s true the tree is selfless and giving, generous and loving and these are all characteristics that I want my son to have and strive after. But, as I read the story this time, I felt uncomfortable with the tree’s giving. It seemed unhealthy. The relationship that the tree has with the boy seems abusive and the tree seems to be victimized in the story. The tree allows herself to be walked all over and taken advantage of time and time again. As I read it I felt uncomfortable with the way that the tree enabled and sustained the little boys consumption and selfishness. I do want my son to be giving, I do want him to pour himself out on behalf of others and love others generously, but I do not want my son to become as weak as this tree and allow himself to be abused and taken advantage of like that. As I look more closely at this story I don’t think that the tree is really worthy of emulating either.

I think the story actually shows us how messed up two good things can become in a relationship. Here’s what I mean… Giving selflessly to another is incredibly beautiful and valuable. And I personally also believe that allowing ourselves to accept and receive and take from another what they freely offer us is also incredibly beautiful and valuable. Relationships need and should have both these things. We should be able to give freely and receive freely in relationships. But, I think there needs to be balance. The problem comes when the balance is lost and it becomes all giving or all taking – it’s then that the relationship can become unhealthy like that of the little boy and the tree. At least that’s what I think at this stage in my life as I read this story. Anyone else have any other thoughts on this classic children’s book??

Rejoicing in the journey -
Bethany

Never Miss A Post – Receive free updates via RSS or Email

If you like this post please consider buying me a cup of tea (Suggested: $3 a cup)



Outliers

January 26th, 2009

Today I finished reading Outliersby Malcolm Gladwell. I really enjoyed this book and would definitely recommend it. I have really enjoyed all of Gladwell’s books (The Tipping Pointand Blink) and find his writing style to be clear and intriguing and his topics to be highly interesting.

This book is about “The Story of Success” – basically he talks about how many of the things that we think make people successful aren’t necessarily the whole story. He argues that much of what makes someone successful are the opportunities they are given and the culture they are born into. He writes:

“People don’t rise from nothing. We do owe something to parentage and patronage. The people who stand before kings may look like they did it all by themselves. But in fact they are invariably the beneficiaries of hidden advantages and extraordinary opportunities and cultural legacies that allow them to learn and work hard and make sense of the world in ways others cannot. It makes a difference where and when we grew up. The culture we belong to and the legacies passed down by our forebears shape the patterns of our achievement in ways we cannot begin to imagine. It’s not enough to ask what successful people are like, in other words. It is only by asking where they are from that we can unravel the logic behind who succeeds and who doesn’t.”

This is not a book to help you learn how you can pull yourself up by the boot straps and be successful. It’s much broader and bigger than that. It’s more about how we as a larger group of people can understand success culturally and instead of blocking success for people can extend the boundaries and give more opportunities for more people to be successful.

“The lesson here is very simple. But it is striking how often it is overlooked. We are so caught in the myths of the best and the brightest and the self-made that we think outliers spring naturally from the earth. We look at the young Bill Gates and marvel that our world allowed that thirteen-year-old unlimited access to a time-sharing terminal in 1968. If a million teenagers had been given the same opportunity, how many more Microsoft’s would we have today? To build a better world we need to replace the patchwork of lucky breaks and arbitrary advantages that today determine success – the fortunate birth dates and the happy accidents of history – with a society that provides opportunities for all. If Canada had a second hockey league for those children born in the last half of the year, it would today have twice as many adult hockey stars. Now multiply that sudden flowering of talent by every field and profession. The world could be so much richer than the world we have settled for.”

I found this book to be incredibly intriguing and I encourage you to read it as well.

Rejoicing in the journey -
Bethany

Never Miss A Post – Receive free updates via RSS or Email

If you like this post please consider buying me a cup of tea (Suggested: $3 a cup)



Vampires, Myths, Mystery and Stories

January 9th, 2009

Ok, so I’m going to admit it… I’ve been sucked into the Edward and Bella vampire hysteria. Well, maybe not hysteria. But, in the past week I read all four of the Twilight series books and I have to admit I really liked them (clearly if I read all of them in a week I more than liked them, but I’m trying to not to sound too ridiculous or fanatical). Hehe.

So, if you know anything about me you know that I love stories. I enjoy reading non-fiction books, I can enjoy watching stand up comedy occasionally, and I do enjoy shows like John Stewart and Steven Colbert, but none of those forms of entertainment can really capture my attention and after a while they bore me. But, stories… that’s another story. I get caught up in stories. You could even say that I get a little bit addicted to stories. Not too long ago I was so wrapped up in a show that Bryan and I were watching that I started hyperventilating when one of the characters died – seriously, no exaggeration – hyperventilating. I know, pathetic, right?

Anyway, Twilight and the books that followed didn’t cause me to hyperventilate or anything, but they did sweep me away into another world for a time and any story that does that get’s my recommendation. I can’t say that Twilight was really an exquisite piece of literary work or anything, but I can say that it was well written, in a fun and relatable tone that made it a enchanting account of young love, desire, temptation, heart break, free will, choice, good vs. evil and the sometimes not so clear distinctions between the two.

Maybe part of why I loved it wasn’t just that it was an appealing story, but also because secretly (or maybe not so secretly) I really love stories about magic and myths and all that. I was first introduced to magic and fantasy and fairy tales through George MacDonald and JRR Tolkien when I was probably no more than 7 and I’ve loved anything having to do with that sort of thing ever since. I’ve always been intrigued by stories of fairies, and elves, and witches, and dwarves, and goblins, and vampires and even aliens. As proven by many of my book choices throughout the years, and the many hours I’ve spent watching Star Trek with my dad, and X-files with friends, and vampire movies with my brother, and on and on. Yes, I admit it, I’m really a geek.

I think some of why I liked that sort of story was that I grew up in a modern scientific age, and a modern church – there was very little mystery, mysticism, or ritual in my normal life, but I always knew that there was something “other” in the world, that not everything could be explained clearly and concisely and I longed for that which was “other” and mysterious. What’s someone who’s a bit of a mystic at heart to do in an age where mysticism is generally shunned?? Turn to good fantasy stories, what else? Hehe.

So, if you like me, are intrigued by magic, myths, superstitions, fairy tales, and the paranormal… or if you just take a little guilty pleasure in sappy romance at times… then I recommend that you check out Twilight, New Moon, Eclipse, and Breaking Dawn – the story of a girl and a vampire who fall in love and the drama that follows.

On a side note, it’s pretty impressive that Twilight was the author, Stephenie Meyer’s first book. She started writing it in 2003 after having a dream about the idea. Now just a few years later she has four books that are top sellers and a movie made from the first book – pretty impressive.

Rejoicing in the journey -
Bethany Stedman

PS – Alan Knox has an interesting post about Twilight here.

Never Miss A Post – Receive free updates via RSS or Email

If you like this post please consider buying me a cup of tea (Suggested: $3 a cup)



Book Review: The Shack

June 11th, 2008

I just finished reading The Shack by William P. Young. I’m not sure where to start in writing about this book. I guess I’ll start by saying that I’ve never cried so much during a book. I found myself almost constantly fighting back tears while reading this book especially the whole second half of it.

When I started reading The Shack I was on an airplane nearing Prague, I felt excited and joyful. I read the foreword and the first chapter of the book and knew right away that I couldn’t continue. I was getting choked up already.

I picked it up again about 2 days ago and continued reading knowing a little more of what I was getting into this time. This second time I picked it up I really struggled with it. The writing style felt a little clunking (which is understandable since this is the authors first book), but really the sometimes awkwardness of the writing just added to the rawness of the story. It felt painful to read – the hurt was so raw and real. Then God showed up and I could feel myself really fighting the picture of intimate love that the author used to portray God – I found myself asking what about justice? What about wrath? What about holiness? And otherness? And an appropriate distance between the God who is other and sinful creation? But, slowly I was drawn in… I was touched and moved, often to tears, at the picture of God I saw here.

I am still processing this book. I’m not really sure what I thought of some parts of it, but I know that overall it really touched me. I would be very curious to know what others thought of this book. If you’ve read it please feel free to tell me about your thoughts on it and your experience with it in the comments.

Rejoicing in the journey -
Beth Stedman

A lot of other people are writing about this book. Here are a few other reviews of the book that you might find interesting:

Here is a review about the Shack which I thought made some great points and raised some good concerns.

Mark Peterson wrote his thoughts on The Shack here and here.

There’s a review on Promomusings here with a lot of interesting comments as well.

Andrew Jones writes his thoughts about the book here.

Never Miss A Post – Receive free updates via RSS or Email

If you like this post please consider buying me a cup of tea (Suggested: $3 a cup)



Brokeness and Beauty portrayed through a song and a book

January 26th, 2008

Have you ever thought about what protects our hearts?
Just a cage of rib bones and other various parts.
So it’s fairly simple to cut right through the mess,
And to stop the muscle that makes us confess.

Today I went to coffee with Carrie and we talked about Middlemarch . I keep thinking about this book – it is really one of the best books I’ve ever read and I think it will stay with me in my thoughts often for years to come. Today we were talking about the end of the book and the overall story and we talked a little bit about the contrast between some of the characters. I started thinking about this a little more and I had some interesting thoughts… all of the main characters where broken in some way – their lives weren’t what they thought, there’s spouses weren’t who they thought they were, their dreams where broken, and their relationships were broken in some way… but they each responded to that brokenness in VERY different ways – some choose to humble themselves and seek reconciliation, to confess their sins and hearts, some choose to set aside their own struggles and disappointments and instead work for someone else’s good – to help someone else. But, others choose to hold onto their pride and hid from others and fight to get their own way and protect themselves instead of someone else. Each struggled with their choice, each had their own inner dialogue about how they would respond to the disappointments and injustices in their lives as well as the outright sin in their lives, but they didn’t all come to the same conclusions. The human soul is indeed capable of great goodness and selflessness, but it is also capable of great ugliness and sin and sometimes the difference between the two comes down to simple daily chooses.

And we are so fragile,
And our cracking bones make noise,
And we are just,
Breakable, breakable, breakable girls and boys

It was interesting to me too that each characters decision to either embrace their selfishness and pride or give it up on behalf of another affected each other character. Our actions are never truly independent of each other – our lives are interwoven. We have the capability to break those around us or to build them up. We have the ability to influence the lives of the people around us in profound ways by simply being there for each other, listening to each other, believing in and trusting each other.
There is one character in the book who starts out with these grand desires to do some great good in the world, but at least according to her original desires she never really does. But, in simply being herself, humble and open and willing to help those around her, she ends up having a profound influence on those around her perhaps without even realizing it. That is encouraging for me. We are fragile creatures and we do easily hurt and break each other, but we can also do much to mend and repair the brokenness in each other’s lives.

“Who that cares much to know the history of man, and how the mysterious mixtures behaves under the varying experiment of Time, has not dwelt, at least briefly, on the life of Saint Theresa, has not smiled with some gentleness at the thought of the little girl walking forth one morning hand-in-hand with her still smaller brother, to go and seek martyrdom in the country of the Moors? … The child pilgrimage was a fit beginning. Theresa’s passionate, ideal nature demanded an epic life: what were many-volumed romances of chivalry and the social conquests of a brilliant girl to her? Her flame quickly burned up that light fuel; and, fed from within, soared after some illimitable satisfaction, some object which would never justify weariness, which would reconcile self-despair with the rapturous consciousness of life beyond self… That Spanish woman who lived three hundred years ago was certainly not the last of her kind. Many Theresas have been born who found for themselves no epic life wherin there was a constant unfolding of far-resonant action… With dim lights and tangled circumstances they tried to shape their thought and deed in noble agreement; but after all, to common eyes their struggles seemed mere inconsistency and formlessness…Their ardour alternated between a vague ideal and the common yearning of womanhood; so that the one was disapproved as extravagance, and the other condemned as a lapse… Here and there is born a Saint Theresa, foundress of nothing, whose loving heart-beats and sobs after an unattained goodness tremble off and are dispersed among hindrances, instead of centering in some long-recognisable deed.”
“Certainly those determining acts of her life were not ideally beautiful. They were the mixed result of young and noble impulse struggling amidst the conditions of an imperfect social state, in which great feelings will often take the aspect of error, and great faith the aspect of illusion. For there is no creature whose inward being is so strong that it is not greatly determined by what lies outside it… we insignificant people with our daily words and acts are preparing the lives of many Dorotheas, some of which may present a far sadder sacrifice than that of the Dorothea whose story we know. Her finely-touched spirit had still its fine issues, though they were not widely visible. Her full nature, like that river of which Cyrus broke the strength, spent itself in channels which had no great name on the earth. But the effort of her being on those around her was incalculable diffusive: for the growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.”

 

 Rejoicing in the journey -
Beth Stedman

Never Miss A Post – Receive free updates via RSS or Email

If you like this post please consider buying me a cup of tea (Suggested: $3 a cup)